Stewart v. McAllister

255 U.S. 559, 41 S. Ct. 321, 65 L. Ed. 785, 1921 U.S. LEXIS 1841
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 31, 1921·No. No. 174·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction: (1) Act of September 6,1916, c. 448, 39 Stat. 726. (2) Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 79; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580, [560]*560583; United Surety Co. v. American Fruit Co., 238 U. S. 140, 142; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182, 184; Berkman v. United States, 250 U. S. 114, 118; Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Graham, 253 U. S. 193.

Mr. Don A. Bliss, with whom Mr. T. T. Vanderhoeven and Mr. Benjamin A. Greathouse were on the brief, for plaintiff in error. Mr. J. G. George, for defendants in error, submitted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stewart v. McAllister, 255 U.S. 559, 41 S. Ct. 321, 65 L. Ed. 785, 1921 U.S. LEXIS 1841 (1921).

255 U.S. 559 (Stewart v. McAllister) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Goodrich v. Ferris
214 U.S. 71 (Supreme Court, 1909)
Toop v. Ulysses Land Co.
237 U.S. 580 (Supreme Court, 1915)
United Surety Co. v. American Fruit Product Co.
238 U.S. 140 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Sugarman v. United States
249 U.S. 182 (Supreme Court, 1919)
Berkman v. United States
250 U.S. 114 (Supreme Court, 1919)
Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Town of Graham
253 U.S. 193 (Supreme Court, 1920)