Home/Supreme Court/Stewart v. McAllister

Stewart v. McAllister

255 U.S. 559, 41 S. Ct. 321, 65 L. Ed. 785, 1921 U.S. LEXIS 1841
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 31, 1921
DocketNo. 174
StatusPublished

This text of 255 U.S. 559 (Stewart v. McAllister) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stewart v. McAllister, 255 U.S. 559, 41 S. Ct. 321, 65 L. Ed. 785, 1921 U.S. LEXIS 1841 (1921).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction: (1) Act of September 6,1916, c. 448, 39 Stat. 726. (2) Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 79; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580, [560]*560583; United Surety Co. v. American Fruit Co., 238 U. S. 140, 142; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182, 184; Berkman v. United States, 250 U. S. 114, 118; Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Graham, 253 U. S. 193.

Mr. Don A. Bliss, with whom Mr. T. T. Vanderhoeven and Mr. Benjamin A. Greathouse were on the brief, for plaintiff in error. Mr. J. G. George, for defendants in error, submitted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Goodrich v. Ferris
214 U.S. 71 (Supreme Court, 1909)
Toop v. Ulysses Land Co.
237 U.S. 580 (Supreme Court, 1915)
United Surety Co. v. American Fruit Product Co.
238 U.S. 140 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Sugarman v. United States
249 U.S. 182 (Supreme Court, 1919)
Berkman v. United States
250 U.S. 114 (Supreme Court, 1919)
Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Town of Graham
253 U.S. 193 (Supreme Court, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
255 U.S. 559, 41 S. Ct. 321, 65 L. Ed. 785, 1921 U.S. LEXIS 1841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-mcallister-scotus-1921.