Stewart v. M'Bride

1 Serg. & Rawle 202
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 23, 1814·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Tilgiímán C. j,

delivered the opinion of the. Court. The declaration contains two counts ; one on a promissory note dated February 16th, 1807"; the other on a note dated February 16th, 1809, each payable one year after date. The action was brought on the 29th November, 1809 ; so that the hote mentioned in the second count, was not due when this Suit Was commenced, The verdict was general; therefore the plaintiff has recovered on a cause of action which had not [203]*203accrued when the suit was commenced. We have decided in other cases, that such an action cannot be supported. Indeed it is contrary to the plain principles of justice. The judgment must therefore be reversed, and a venire de novo awarded.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stewart v. M'Bride, 1 Serg. & Rawle 202 (Pa. 1814).

1 Serg. & Rawle 202 (Stewart v. M'Bride) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Corrigan v. Bank of America, N.A.
189 So. 3d 187 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Roud v. Griffith
11 Serg. & Rawle 130 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1824)