Stewart v. Mayor of Gainesville
125 S.E. 384, 33 Ga. App. 44, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 704
This text of 125 S.E. 384 (Stewart v. Mayor of Gainesville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Stewart v. Mayor of Gainesville, 125 S.E. 384, 33 Ga. App. 44, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 704 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).
Opinion
1. The evidence authorized the verdict.
2. The special grounds of the motion for a new trial which assign error on the rulings upon the admissibility of evidence are without merit. Similar evidence was allowed to go to the jury without objection.
3. The charge of the court was- full, fair, and not subject to the objections raised in the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
125 S.E. 384, 33 Ga. App. 44, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 704, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-mayor-of-gainesville-gactapp-1924.