Stewart v. Mayor of Gainesville

125 S.E. 384, 33 Ga. App. 44, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 704
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 12, 1924
Docket15766
StatusPublished

This text of 125 S.E. 384 (Stewart v. Mayor of Gainesville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stewart v. Mayor of Gainesville, 125 S.E. 384, 33 Ga. App. 44, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 704 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. The evidence authorized the verdict.

2. The special grounds of the motion for a new trial which assign error on the rulings upon the admissibility of evidence are without merit. Similar evidence was allowed to go to the jury without objection.

[45]*45Decided November 12, 1924. E. D. Kenyon, for plaintiff. Dean & Wright, for defendant.

3. The charge of the court was- full, fair, and not subject to the objections raised in the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloockoorth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
125 S.E. 384, 33 Ga. App. 44, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 704, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-mayor-of-gainesville-gactapp-1924.