Stewart v. Manger
This text of Stewart v. Manger (Stewart v. Manger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7299
MAURICE BERNARD STEWART, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DOCTOR MANGER; NURSE MANGES; OTHER UNKNOWN NAMED NURSE; EMPLOYEES OF PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, in their official & personal capacities, Western Correctional Institution; NURSE KALANUT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA- 02-2169-1-JFM)
Submitted: December 17, 2003 Decided: February 20, 2004
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Maurice Bernard Stewart, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Conrad Whiting Varner, Frederick William Goundry, III, VARNER & GOUNDRY, Frederick, Maryland; Donald Joseph Crawford, ALDELMAN, SHEFF & SMITH, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Maurice Bernard Stewart, Jr., appeals the district
court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Stewart v. Manger, No. CA-02-2169-1-JFM (D.
Md. July 17, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Stewart v. Manger, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-manger-ca4-2004.