Stewart v. Maitland
922 N.E.2d 889, 13 N.Y.3d 922, 895 N.Y.S.2d 301, 2010 N.Y. LEXIS 223
This text of 922 N.E.2d 889 (Stewart v. Maitland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Stewart v. Maitland, 922 N.E.2d 889, 13 N.Y.3d 922, 895 N.Y.S.2d 301, 2010 N.Y. LEXIS 223 (N.Y. 2010).
Opinion
Motion, insofar as defendants Maitland and Guida seek leave to appeal, dismissed upon the ground that as to these defend *923 ants, the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion, insofar as defendants International Registries, Inc. and Oban, LLC seek leave to appeal, denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Singh v. CITY OF NEW YORK DIVISION OF HOUSING PRESERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT
13 N.Y.3d 922 (New York Court of Appeals, 2010)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
922 N.E.2d 889, 13 N.Y.3d 922, 895 N.Y.S.2d 301, 2010 N.Y. LEXIS 223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-maitland-ny-2010.