Stewart v. Lowry, 2008-P-0068 (12-5-2008)
This text of 2008 Ohio 6414 (Stewart v. Lowry, 2008-P-0068 (12-5-2008)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
{¶ 2} In the July 1, 2008 judgment entry, the trial court denied Delbert's May 16, 2008 motion to reconsider the granting of summary judgment to the various defending parties. Delbert indicates on his notice of appeal that he is appealing several trial court judgment entries. However, a review of the judgment entries and the trial court docket shows that on March 11, 2008, the trial court granted the motion for summary judgment filed by appellees, Randal A. Lowry, and Weick, Gibson, and Lowry. Delbert never filed an appeal from the March 11, 2008 judgment entry granting summary judgment. Also, on March 28, 2008, the trial court denied Delbert's Civ. R. 60(B) motion. No appeal was filed thirty days from that judgment entry.
{¶ 3} It is well established that the filing of a motion for reconsideration from a final appealable order in the trial court is a nullity. Pitts v. Ohio Dept. of Transp. (1981),
{¶ 4} Based upon the foregoing analysis, this appeal is hereby dismissed, sua sponte, for lack of a final appealable order and untimeliness.
{¶ 5} Appeal dismissed.
*Page 1MARY JANE TRAPP, J., TIMOTHY P. CANNON, J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2008 Ohio 6414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-lowry-2008-p-0068-12-5-2008-ohioctapp-2008.