Stewart v. Liberty Mutual Insurance

315 So. 2d 337, 1975 La. App. LEXIS 3902
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedJune 30, 1975
DocketNo. 10330
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 315 So. 2d 337 (Stewart v. Liberty Mutual Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stewart v. Liberty Mutual Insurance, 315 So. 2d 337, 1975 La. App. LEXIS 3902 (La. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

SARTAIN, Judge.

This is a suit for damages instituted by plaintiff, Lloyd Stewart, against defendant, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, the alleged insurer of U.S. Plywood Corporation. The trial judge rendered judgment in favor of plaintiff in the amount of $10,000.00 and defendant brings this appeal. We reverse.

The record shows that plaintiff, in his original petition, alleges damage to a pond situated on his property sustained as a result of the operation and activities of U.S. Plywood Corporation. It is further alleged that defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company was the insurer of U. S. Plywood Corporation at the time of the incident. Defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company is the only defendant in the suit since plaintiff did not join the alleged insured.

Defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company in its answer denied all of plaintiff’s allegations and asked that plaintiffs claim be dismissed. On appeal defendant maintains its contention that the suit be dismissed on grounds that plaintiff has failed to prove any contract of insurance between defendant and U.S. Plywood Corporation.

It is a basic and fundamental requirement that the plaintiff bears the burden of proving the insurance coverage upon which his claim is based by a preponderance of the evidence. Turner v. Ewing, 255 La. 659, 232 So.2d 468 (1970). After a careful perusal of the record we find no evidence to establish liability on the part of defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company.

Defendant has consistently denied that it was the liability insurer of U.S. Plywood and no policy was produced at trial to contradict this denial. Thus we are compelled to conclude that plaintiff has failed to carry his burden of proof.

For the above and foregoing reasons the judgment of the trial court in favor of plaintiff is reversed and judgment is hereby rendered in favor of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company dismissing plaintiff’s suit.

All costs of these proceedings are assessed against plaintiff-appellee.

Reversed and rendered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pendleton v. Spartan Bldg. Const.
432 So. 2d 298 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1983)
Bordelon v. Safeway Ins. Co.
380 So. 2d 1379 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1980)
Richardson v. Department of Highways
345 So. 2d 985 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
315 So. 2d 337, 1975 La. App. LEXIS 3902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-liberty-mutual-insurance-lactapp-1975.