Stewart v. Krishnan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Stewart v. Krishnan

206 A.D.2d 417, 614 N.Y.S.2d 931

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 11, 1994·Published

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Scholnick, J.), dated April 2, 1993, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dis[418]*418missing the complaint on the ground that the action was barred by the Statute of Limitations and denied their cross motion to dismiss the defendant’s affirmative defenses based on the Statute of Limitations.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in Stewart v Tetenbaum (206 AD2d 418 [decided herewith]). Thompson, J. P., O’Brien, Ritter and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Scholnick, J.), dated April 2, 1993, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dis[418]*418missing the complaint on the ground that the action was barred by the Statute of Limitations and denied their cross motion to dismiss the defendant’s affirmative defenses based on the Statute of Limitations.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in Stewart v Tetenbaum (206 AD2d 418 [decided herewith]). Thompson, J. P., O’Brien, Ritter and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Stewart v. Krishnan, 206 A.D.2d 417, 614 N.Y.S.2d 931 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

206 A.D.2d 417 (Stewart v. Krishnan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related