Stewart v. Keller
This text of 219 A.D. 833 (Stewart v. Keller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order dismissing action as res adjudicata reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion demed, with ton dollars costs. While there is a suggestion that the application of plaintiff Anna Stewart to open her default in the County Court was denied because the court had no jurisdiction, it clearly appears that the judgment was entered on that plaintiff’s default. In neither event was it a judgment on the merits, and, therefore, it is not a bar to this action. It could not be a bar against Morris Stewart for he was not a party to the County Court action. Kelly, P. J., Manning, Young, Lazansky and Hagarty, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
219 A.D. 833, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-keller-nyappdiv-1927.