Stewart v. Kaiser Co.

D. Oregon

Stewart v. Kaiser Co.

71 F. Supp. 551, 1947 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2769

CourtDistrict Court, D. Oregon

DecidedMarch 26, 1947

DocketCivil Actions Nos. 3008, 3030, 3065, 3269, and 3399

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 71 F. Supp. 551 (Stewart v. Kaiser Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stewart v. Kaiser Co., 71 F. Supp. 551, 1947 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2769 (D. Or. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

McCOLLOCH, District Judge.

In this group of cases large sums are demanded of the Government by war time workers who were employed in the Kaiser shipyards at Portland and Vancouver, Washington. On one ground or another the plaintiffs assert they were underpaid according to the terms of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq. In one case $100,000 attorneys’ fees are demanded.

The Pre-Trial confirmed what has been the general understanding, that the Kaiser war time operations were one hundred per cent, financed and controlled by the Government. The Kaiser genius for production was employed in a management capacity in the expenditure of vast public funds in the war effort. Any recovery in these cases will be paid from the public Treasury.

As the country faces about to meet a new foe, it must be remembered that the men and women who worked in the shipyards were doing no more than their proper part in the war. They were well paid and well cared for in every respect. Their services could have been demanded on lesser terms.

There must come an end to gouging the Government. Nothing that I heard at the Pre-Trial makes me believe that the Government, the ultimate paymaster, is under obligation to pay guards and other shipyard employees a second time, and in addition attorneys’ fees. In short, the employment was provided by the Government, it was directed and controlled by the Government, and the Wages and Hours Act, which was enacted as a peace time measure to improve working conditions in private industry, has no application in the respect here claimed.

The cases will proceed to trial on the issue of coverage.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCOLLOCH, District Judge.

In this group of cases large sums are demanded of the Government by war time workers who were employed in the Kaiser shipyards at Portland and Vancouver, Washington. On one ground or another the plaintiffs assert they were underpaid according to the terms of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq. In one case $100,000 attorneys’ fees are demanded.

The Pre-Trial confirmed what has been the general understanding, that the Kaiser war time operations were one hundred per cent, financed and controlled by the Government. The Kaiser genius for production was employed in a management capacity in the expenditure of vast public funds in the war effort. Any recovery in these cases will be paid from the public Treasury.

As the country faces about to meet a new foe, it must be remembered that the men and women who worked in the shipyards were doing no more than their proper part in the war. They were well paid and well cared for in every respect. Their services could have been demanded on lesser terms.

There must come an end to gouging the Government. Nothing that I heard at the Pre-Trial makes me believe that the Government, the ultimate paymaster, is under obligation to pay guards and other shipyard employees a second time, and in addition attorneys’ fees. In short, the employment was provided by the Government, it was directed and controlled by the Government, and the Wages and Hours Act, which was enacted as a peace time measure to improve working conditions in private industry, has no application in the respect here claimed.

The cases will proceed to trial on the issue of coverage.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 F. Supp. 551, 1947 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-kaiser-co-ord-1947.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack