Stewart v. J.P. Mach Agri-Marketing, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Stewart v. J.P. Mach Agri-Marketing, Inc.

641 So. 2d 202, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8453, 1994 WL 460261

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 26, 1994·No. No. 93-1475·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The issue of applicability of sections 672.-209 and 672.201, Florida Statutes, was not raised before the hearing officer or the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services during the administrative proceedings and therefore, not properly raised for the first time on appeal. Escambia County v. Trans Pac, 584 So.2d 603 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

Affirmed.

ERVIN, WOLF and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The issue of applicability of sections 672.-209 and 672.201, Florida Statutes, was not raised before the hearing officer or the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services during the administrative proceedings and therefore, not properly raised for the first time on appeal. Escambia County v. Trans Pac, 584 So.2d 603 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

Affirmed.

ERVIN, WOLF and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Stewart v. J.P. Mach Agri-Marketing, Inc., 641 So. 2d 202, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8453, 1994 WL 460261 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

641 So. 2d 202 (Stewart v. J.P. Mach Agri-Marketing, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related