Stewart v. Jarrett

Fourth Circuit

Stewart v. Jarrett

179 F. App'x 186

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 8, 2006·No. No. 06-6223·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Raymond Stewart appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action for failure to comply with a court order regarding filing fees. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Stewart v. Jarrett, No. 2:05-cv-00549-RGD (E.D.Va. Jan. 19, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Raymond Stewart appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action for failure to comply with a court order regarding filing fees. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Stewart v. Jarrett, No. 2:05-cv-00549-RGD (E.D.Va. Jan. 19, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Stewart v. Jarrett, 179 F. App'x 186 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

179 F. App'x 186 (Stewart v. Jarrett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related