Stewart v. J. E. Ertel & Co.

121 N.E. 661, 69 Ind. App. 290, 1919 Ind. App. LEXIS 93
CourtIndiana Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 30, 1919
DocketNo. 9,729
StatusPublished

This text of 121 N.E. 661 (Stewart v. J. E. Ertel & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stewart v. J. E. Ertel & Co., 121 N.E. 661, 69 Ind. App. 290, 1919 Ind. App. LEXIS 93 (Ind. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

Nichols, J.

This is an action by the appellee against the appellant and city of Indianapolis for damages in tort.

The cause was commenced and tried before a justice of the peace of Center township, Marion county, where, from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, defendants appealed to the superior court of Marion county, where the cause was tried, and judgment rendered against the defendants. A motion for a new trial was filed by the defendants, which was overruled. From the judgment and ruling of the court, the defendant John Stewart appeals. The defendant city of Indianapolis does not appeal.

The only error relied upon for reversal is that the court, over the objection of the appellant, submitted the cause for trial to a jury of six jurors, instead of twelve jurors, there being no agreement to try the cause wdth fewer than twelve jurors.

The court seems to have relied upon §1793 Burns 1914, §1502 R. S. 1881, providing that on appeals from justices of the peace the same rules and regulations shall govern the trial court as are prescribed for trials before such justices. But it is held that this section does not apply to the selection of a jury. Vanschoiack v. Farrow (1865), 25 Ind. 310; Kerschner v. Cullen (1866), 27 Ind. 184.

[292]*292The court committed reversible error, and the cause is reversed, with instructions to grant appellant a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vanschoiack v. Farrow
25 Ind. 310 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1865)
Kerschner v. Cullen
27 Ind. 184 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1866)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
121 N.E. 661, 69 Ind. App. 290, 1919 Ind. App. LEXIS 93, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-j-e-ertel-co-indctapp-1919.