Stewart v. Georgia Terminal Co.
This text of 70 S.E. 867 (Stewart v. Georgia Terminal Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
1. Under the ruling in East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Ry. Co. v. Boardman, 96 Ga. 356 (23 S. E. 403), the obstruction, at least of some of the streets complained of, did' not furnish ground for the recovery of damages by the plaintiff.
2. If any of the grounds of special damages would have sustained a recovery, the evidence introduced by the plaintiff failed to show the amount of damages arising from such causes as different from other causes not furnishing a right of recovery. There was no error, therefore, in granting a nonsuit.
3. None of the assignments of error upon rulings of the court on the admissibility of evidence show any error requiring a reversal.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
70 S.E. 867, 136 Ga. 36, 1911 Ga. LEXIS 405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-georgia-terminal-co-ga-1911.