Stewart v. Gainesville Glass Co.
This text of 212 S.E.2d 377 (Stewart v. Gainesville Glass Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The only issue raised in this certiorari is breach of express warranty. Under our decision in Ellis v. Rich’s, Inc., 233 Ga. 581, privity is required in actions for breach of express warranties except as provided in Code Ann. § 109A-2 — 318 and except as pointed out in the Court of Appeals opinion where the warranty clearly extends to some identifiable third person. The Court of Appeals opinion is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
212 S.E.2d 377, 233 Ga. 578, 16 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 687, 1975 Ga. LEXIS 1377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-gainesville-glass-co-ga-1975.