Stewart v. Elliott

Ohio Supreme Court

Stewart v. Elliott

12 N.E.3d 1232, 139 Ohio St. 3d 1488

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 24, 2014·No. 2014-0977·Published

Opinion

Portage App. No. 2013-P-0009, 2014-Ohio-1872. This cause is pending before the court as a jurisdictional appeal.

Upon consideration of the motion for admission pro hac vice of Michael Artz, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted. Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. XII(4), counsel shall file a notice of permission to appear pro hac vice with the Supreme Court’s Office of Attorney Services within 30 days of the date of this entry.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Portage App. No. 2013-P-0009, 2014-Ohio-1872. This cause is pending before the court as a jurisdictional appeal.

Upon consideration of the motion for admission pro hac vice of Michael Artz, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted. Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. XII(4), counsel shall file a notice of permission to appear pro hac vice with the Supreme Court’s Office of Attorney Services within 30 days of the date of this entry.

Stewart v. Elliott, 12 N.E.3d 1232, 139 Ohio St. 3d 1488 (Ohio 2014).

Pincite

12 N.E.3d 1232 (Stewart v. Elliott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related