Stewart v. Commonwealth

4 Serg. & Rawle 194
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 21, 1818·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Duncan J.

The judgment should be reversed, because it does not appear by the indictment, thát any felony was committed, or intended to be committed, the charge of felony being too vague and uncertain, viz. that “ the defendant feloniously stole, ,took, and carried away sundry promissory notes for the payment of money, of the value of eighty dollars, of the goods and chattels of the said Abraham Miller.” The notes should have been more particularly described, and it should have been set forth, that the money was unpaid on them.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stewart v. Commonwealth, 4 Serg. & Rawle 194 (Pa. 1818).

4 Serg. & Rawle 194 (Stewart v. Commonwealth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Jackson
8 Barb. 637 (New York Supreme Court, 1850)
Commonwealth v. Gillespie
7 Serg. & Rawle 469 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1822)