Stewart v. Commonwealth

250 S.W. 1009, 199 Ky. 286, 1923 Ky. LEXIS 832
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Stewart v. Commonwealth. Read the opinion of the Court — 197 Ky. 501
Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided May 18, 1923·Published

Opinion

[287]*287Opinion op the Court by

Judge Moorman

— Affirming.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Fayette circuit court convicting appellant of the offense of unlawfully having in his possession intoxicating liquors not for sacramental, medicinal, scientific or mechanical purposes. It is argued that the judgment should he reversed because of the admission of evidence that was procured under an illegal search warrant.

The warrant was issued by a commissioner of the United States Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, and was executed by Federal officers. The questions argued are identical -with those considered by this court in Walker v. Commonwealth, 199 Ky. 182, where the evidence procured under a warrant and affidavit similar to those involved in this case was held admissible. On the authority of that decision the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stewart v. Commonwealth, 250 S.W. 1009, 199 Ky. 286, 1923 Ky. LEXIS 832 (Ky. Ct. App. 1923).

250 S.W. 1009 (Stewart v. Commonwealth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walters v. Commonwealth
250 S.W. 839 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1923)