Stewart v. Commissioner of Social Security

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio
DecidedFebruary 7, 2020
Docket3:18-cv-00237
StatusUnknown

This text of Stewart v. Commissioner of Social Security (Stewart v. Commissioner of Social Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Ohio primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stewart v. Commissioner of Social Security, (S.D. Ohio 2020).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

WENDY STEWART, : Case No. 3:18-cv-237 : Plaintiff, : Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington : (by full consent of the parties) vs. : : COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL : SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, : : Defendant. :

DECISION AND ENTRY

This case is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion for an Award of Attorney Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. (Doc. #16). Specifically, the parties stipulate to an award to Plaintiff of attorney fees in the total amount of $5,000.00, and no costs, in full satisfaction and settlement of any and all claims Plaintiff may have under the EAJA in the above case. Prior to Plaintiff filing an EAJA petition, the parties jointly reached a resolution to settle EAJA fees in this case. This Stipulation represents a compromise on disputed positions and is not intended to set precedent for, or a representation of, any specific hourly rate or total number of hours. The award of attorney fees will satisfy all of Plaintiff’s claims for fees, costs, and expenses under 28 U.S.C. § 2412 in this case. Any fees paid belong to Plaintiff and can be offset to satisfy pre-existing debt that Plaintiff owes the United States pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010). After the Court enters this award, if counsel for the parties can verify that

Plaintiff owes no pre-existing debt subject to offset, Defendant agrees to direct that the award be made payable to Plaintiff’s attorney pursuant to the EAJA assignment duly signed by Plaintiff. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. The Parties’ Joint Motion for an Award of Attorney Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (Doc. #16) is accepted and Defendant shall pay Plaintiff=s attorney fees, costs, and expenses in the total amount of $5,000.00;

2. Counsel for the parties shall verify, within thirty days of this Decision and Entry, whether or not Plaintiff owes a pre- existing debt to the United States subject to offset. If no such pre-existing debt exists, Defendant shall pay the EAJA award directly to Plaintiff=s counsel pursuant to the EAJA assignment signed by Plaintiff; and

3. The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

February 7, 2020 s/Sharon L. Ovington Sharon L. Ovington United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Stewart v. Commissioner of Social Security, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-commissioner-of-social-security-ohsd-2020.