Stewart v. Climax Road Machine Co.

50 A. 1119, 200 Pa. 611, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 541
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 11, 1901·No. Appeal, No. 14·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This was an action of assumpsit which resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $1,518 and costs. The defendant company being dissatisfied with the verdict, entered this appeal. In its paper-book we find twelve assignments in each of which error is charged to the learned judge of the court below. Each of said assignments have been carefully examined and considered by us, and our conclusion from the examination thus made is that no materia] error appears in either of said assignments. We therefore affirm the judgment entered on the verdict above mentioned.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stewart v. Climax Road Machine Co., 50 A. 1119, 200 Pa. 611, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 541 (Pa. 1901).

50 A. 1119 (Stewart v. Climax Road Machine Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sebastianelli Et Vir. v. C. Simpson Co.
31 A.2d 570 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1943)
Dobbs v. Zink
138 A. 758 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1927)
Commonwealth v. Goldstein
6 Pa. D. & C. 418 (Washington County Court of Quarter Sessions, 1925)
Hoskins v. Peoples
42 Pa. Super. 611 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1910)
Singer Manufacturing Co. v. Christian
60 A. 1087 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1905)