Stewart v. Climax Road Machine Co.

50 A. 1119, 200 Pa. 611, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 541
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 11, 1901
DocketAppeal, No. 14
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 50 A. 1119 (Stewart v. Climax Road Machine Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stewart v. Climax Road Machine Co., 50 A. 1119, 200 Pa. 611, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 541 (Pa. 1901).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This was an action of assumpsit which resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $1,518 and costs. The defendant company being dissatisfied with the verdict, entered this appeal. In its paper-book we find twelve assignments in each of which error is charged to the learned judge of the court below. Each of said assignments have been carefully examined and considered by us, and our conclusion from the examination thus made is that no materia] error appears in either of said assignments. We therefore affirm the judgment entered on the verdict above mentioned.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sebastianelli Et Vir. v. C. Simpson Co.
31 A.2d 570 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1943)
Dobbs v. Zink
138 A. 758 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1927)
Commonwealth v. Goldstein
6 Pa. D. & C. 418 (Washington County Court of Quarter Sessions, 1925)
Hoskins v. Peoples
42 Pa. Super. 611 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1910)
Singer Manufacturing Co. v. Christian
60 A. 1087 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
50 A. 1119, 200 Pa. 611, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-climax-road-machine-co-pa-1901.