Stewart v. Clark
This text of 60 Md. 310 (Stewart v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court.
If the appellant had. foreclosed his mortgage on the leasehold property himself, and sold it, it is clear that the taxes and ground rents due thereon at the time of such sale, must have been paid out of the proceeds of the sale before the purchaser took a good title thereto. When the -same leasehold property is sold by the insolvent trustees, we fail to see upon what principle of equity, the leasehold property should be relieved from the ground rents and taxes due upon it, and the burden cast upon the other personal property of the insolvent.
The appellant had no lien on the personal property for his rents as he had not distrained. Nor is there any [312]*312proof before us that any valid seizure by way of distraint,, by the Collector of the city had ever been made.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 Md. 310, 1883 Md. LEXIS 31, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-clark-md-1883.