Stewart v. Burkhalter

28 Miss. 396
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1854
StatusPublished

This text of 28 Miss. 396 (Stewart v. Burkhalter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stewart v. Burkhalter, 28 Miss. 396 (Mich. 1854).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Fishee

delivered the opinion of the court.

The appellants as distributees of the estate of Jesse Burk-halter, deceased, filed their petition in the probate court of Covington county, for the purpose of compelling the appellee as administrator of the said Jesse Burkhalter, to inventory certain property, of which it is alleged the intestate died seized.

The petition alleges that Jesse, Joshua, and John Burkhal-ter owned, as copartners, fourteen slaves; which have been sold by the survivors, and that Joshua Burkhalter, as administrator of Jesse Burkhalter, has not returned an account of the interest of the intestate.

The court below sustained a demurrer to the petition, from’ which this appeal has been prosecuted.

The title to the property on the death of Jesse Burkhalter,. vested in the survivors, who were authorized to sell or dispose of the property for copartnership purposes. Upon settlement of" the copartnership account, the survivors would be compelled to account for the surplus or portion due to the estate of the-intestate. If this surplus should fall into the hands of the present administrator, the probate court could compel him to account for it, under that provision of the law, which requires an executor or administrator to give in a claim against himself..

As it does not appear by the petition that the copartnership accounts have been settled, that there is a surplus of the copart-nership funds, arising from the sale of the slaves, or that such* [398]*398surplus is in the hands of the administrator, we think the petition is therefore defective, and that the demurrer was, therefore, properly sustained.

The decree will be so modified as to dismiss the petition without prejudice, and to permit the petitioners, if they choose, to file another petition in the probate court.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 Miss. 396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-burkhalter-miss-1854.