Stewart v. Brookdale University Hospital & Medical Center

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Stewart v. Brookdale University Hospital & Medical Center

62 A.D.3d 860, 878 N.Y.S.2d 897

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 19, 2009·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for wrongful death, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme [861] Court, Kings County (Levine, J.), dated February 8, 2008, as denied that branch of its motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

In response to the defendant’s showing of its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of whether it committed medical malpractice in discharging Kevon Stewart, the decedent’s son, from its psychiatric facility on May 6, 2004, the plaintiff established the existence of a triable issue of fact (see Schrempf v State of New York, 66 NY2d 289, 295-296 [1985]; Seibert v Fink, 280 AD2d 661 [2001]; Clark v State of New York, 99 AD2d 616, 616-617 [1984]; see generally Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit (see Schrempf v State of New York, 66 NY2d 289, 294-295 [1985]; Engelhart v County of Orange, 16 AD3d 369, 371 [2005]; Clark v State of New York, 99 AD2d 616 [1984]). Skelos, J.P., Florio, Leventhal and Hall, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for wrongful death, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme [861] Court, Kings County (Levine, J.), dated February 8, 2008, as denied that branch of its motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

In response to the defendant’s showing of its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of whether it committed medical malpractice in discharging Kevon Stewart, the decedent’s son, from its psychiatric facility on May 6, 2004, the plaintiff established the existence of a triable issue of fact (see Schrempf v State of New York, 66 NY2d 289, 295-296 [1985]; Seibert v Fink, 280 AD2d 661 [2001]; Clark v State of New York, 99 AD2d 616, 616-617 [1984]; see generally Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit (see Schrempf v State of New York, 66 NY2d 289, 294-295 [1985]; Engelhart v County of Orange, 16 AD3d 369, 371 [2005]; Clark v State of New York, 99 AD2d 616 [1984]). Skelos, J.P., Florio, Leventhal and Hall, JJ., concur.

Stewart v. Brookdale University Hospital & Medical Center, 62 A.D.3d 860, 878 N.Y.S.2d 897 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

62 A.D.3d 860 (Stewart v. Brookdale University Hospital & Medical Center) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related