Stewart v. BP Amoco Chem. Co.

257 So. 3d 177
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedNovember 20, 2018
DocketNO. 2018-CC-1521
StatusPublished

This text of 257 So. 3d 177 (Stewart v. BP Amoco Chem. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stewart v. BP Amoco Chem. Co., 257 So. 3d 177 (La. 2018).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Granted. We find the district court abused its discretion by denying relators' exception of lack of personal jurisdiction as a sanction for failure to comply with discovery. See generally Horton v. McCary , 93-2315 (La. 4/11/94), 635 So.2d 199. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is vacated and set aside insofar as it denies the exception as a sanction. The case is remanded to the district court for imposition of a less drastic sanction and for reconsideration of the exception of lack of personal jurisdiction on the merits.1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Horton v. McCary
635 So. 2d 199 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
257 So. 3d 177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-bp-amoco-chem-co-la-2018.