Stewart v. Bland
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6119
CEDRIC DEMON STEWART,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
M. BLAND, Job Coordinator; P. SMITH, Ed Director; MAJOR WALKER, Chief of Security,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:07-cv-00512-RAJ-JEB)
Submitted: June 26, 2008 Decided: July 1, 2008
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cedric Demon Stewart, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Cedric Demon Stewart appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28
U.S.C. § 1915(g) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Stewart v. Bland, No. 2:07-cv-00512-RAJ-JEB
(E.D. Va. Dec. 7, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stewart v. Bland (Stewart v. Bland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.