Stewart v. Biddack
2 U.S. 158
Opinion
IN ERROR. Detinet for Connecticut money. On report of referrees, finding a certain sum in Connecticut money due to the plaintiff, judgment was entered for the value, in Pennsylvania money. The judgment was reversed by consent; and Lewis urged, that the Court here could give the same judgment that the Court below had given. But, on considering the authorities, he abandoned the point.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stewart v. Biddack, 2 U.S. 158 (1792).
2 U.S. 158 (Stewart v. Biddack) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.