Stewart v. Betzer

20 La. 137
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedFebruary 15, 1868
DocketNo. 1545
StatusPublished

This text of 20 La. 137 (Stewart v. Betzer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stewart v. Betzer, 20 La. 137 (La. 1868).

Opinion

Howedd, J".

A motion is maclo to dismiss the appeal in this case on the ground that the judgment appealed from was rendered upon the confession of the defendant.

Suit was instituted on a building contract, for a balance alleged to be due. The answer admitted an indebtedness for a much smaller sum, and contested the plaintiff’s right to recover any greater amount. On motion, judgment was rendered for the sum admitted, without prejudice to the right to recover the remainder, from which defendant appealed.

The proceeding was regular, and the judgment was clearly based on the admission of the defendant, from which, under article 567 C. P., ho cannot appeal. Any admission of the claim, which leaves no issue to be tried in regard thereto, is a confession of judgment. 5R. 447; 9L. 415; 4 R. 44; 4 A. 407; 11 A. 740.

It is therefore ordered that the appeal herein be dismissed, at the costs of appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Case of Hartman's Estate
4 Rawle 39 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1833)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 La. 137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-betzer-la-1868.