Stewart v. Angelone

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 25, 1999·No. 98-7734·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7734

JOHN WESLEY STEWART,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RON ANGELONE, Director, VDOC; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; EUGENE MURPHY,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-98-407-R)

Submitted: February 11, 1999 Decided: February 25, 1999

Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Wesley Stewart, Appellant Pro Se. Rick Randall Linker, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

John Wesley Stewart seeks to appeal the district court’s

orders denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. §

2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998), and his motion for reconsideration.

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. See Stewart v. Angelone, No. CA-98-407-R (W.D. Va.

Sept. 21 & Nov. 17, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stewart v. Angelone, (4th Cir. 1999).

Stewart v. Angelone (Stewart v. Angelone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related