Stewart v. Alachua County

320 So. 2d 33
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 8, 1975·No. No. X-260·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon considering the briefs, record, and oral argument, we find no reversible error.

In determination of just compensation to be awarded for business damages in an eminent domain proceeding, jury’s verdict must be within range of evidence adduced at trial, and be an amount not lower than lowest nor higher than highest figure supported by the evidence. Sallas v. State Road Department of Florida, 220 So.2d 378 (Fla.App. 1st, 1969).

Accordingly, the final judgment is affirmed.

McCORD, Acting C. J., and MILLS and SMITH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stewart v. Alachua County, 320 So. 2d 33 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

320 So. 2d 33 (Stewart v. Alachua County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

STATE, DOT v. Weggies Banana Boat
576 So. 2d 722 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Tuttle v. Division of Administration, State of Florida Department of Transportation
327 So. 2d 841 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)