Stewart v. Ackerson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Stewart v. Ackerson

59 A.D.2d 750, 398 N.Y.S.2d 852, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13767

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 20, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 59 A.D.2d 750 (Stewart v. Ackerson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stewart v. Ackerson, 59 A.D.2d 750, 398 N.Y.S.2d 852, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13767 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In each of the above-entitled proceedings, a [751]*751judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated October 18, 1977, has been made denying the respective applications, based upon the determination of Special Term in Matter of O’Kie v Aekerson, which was affirmed by this court (59 AD2d 749). The attorneys for the respective parties have submitted a stipulation which provides, in pertinent part: "it is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the attorneys for the respective parties that the Appellate Division affirm the above entitled actions for the reasons set forth in O’Kie, et al. v Aekerson, et al., since the same facts and law exists in the above entitled actions and O’Kie, et al v Aekerson et al.” Accordingly, the judgments are affirmed, without costs or disbursements (see Matter of O’Kie v Aekerson, supra). Hopkins, J. P., Cohalan, Margett and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In each of the above-entitled proceedings, a [751]*751judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated October 18, 1977, has been made denying the respective applications, based upon the determination of Special Term in Matter of O’Kie v Aekerson, which was affirmed by this court (59 AD2d 749). The attorneys for the respective parties have submitted a stipulation which provides, in pertinent part: "it is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the attorneys for the respective parties that the Appellate Division affirm the above entitled actions for the reasons set forth in O’Kie, et al. v Aekerson, et al., since the same facts and law exists in the above entitled actions and O’Kie, et al v Aekerson et al.” Accordingly, the judgments are affirmed, without costs or disbursements (see Matter of O’Kie v Aekerson, supra). Hopkins, J. P., Cohalan, Margett and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 A.D.2d 750, 398 N.Y.S.2d 852, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-ackerson-nyappdiv-1977.