Stewart, Sr. Et Ux. v. Gaines

138 So. 476, 137 So. 794, 103 Fla. 268
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 2, 1931
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 138 So. 476 (Stewart, Sr. Et Ux. v. Gaines) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stewart, Sr. Et Ux. v. Gaines, 138 So. 476, 137 So. 794, 103 Fla. 268 (Fla. 1931).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

In this cause Mr. Justice Whitfield, Mr. Justice Ellis and Mr. Justice Terrell are of opinion that the decree of the Circuit Court should be affirmed, while Mr. Chief Justice Buford, Mr. Justice Brown and Mr. Justice Davis are of opinion that the decree should be reversed. When the members, of the Supreme Court are sitting six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the decree should be af *271 firmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the court, the decree should be affirmed; therefore it is considered, ordered and adjudged under the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 South. Rep. 51, that the decree of the Circuit Court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Davis, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Orr v. Allen-Hanford, Inc.
27 So. 2d 823 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1946)
R. W. Holding Corp. v. R. I. W. Waterproofing & Decorating Co.
179 So. 753 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
138 So. 476, 137 So. 794, 103 Fla. 268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-sr-et-ux-v-gaines-fla-1931.