Stewart, Dawn Kuretsch
This text of Stewart, Dawn Kuretsch (Stewart, Dawn Kuretsch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. 324-03
DAWN KURETSCH STEWART, Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
FROM THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS
BEXAR COUNTY
Womack, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which Johnson, J., joined.I join the opinion of the Court. I write only to emphasize that, because of the peculiar procedural posture of this appeal, that opinion does not resolve the problem that faces trial courts: whether to admit breath-test results without extrapolation evidence. This appeal presents only half of the problem, relevancy. As Judge Price's opinion, post, points out, there are serious issues about the other half, weighing the relevancy value against possibly unfair prejudicial effect.
En banc.
Delivered February 18, 2004.
Publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Stewart, Dawn Kuretsch, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-dawn-kuretsch-texcrimapp-2004.