Stewart, Dawn Kuretsch

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 3, 2004·No. PD-0324-03·Published

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. 324-03

DAWN KURETSCH STEWART, Appellant



v.



THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee



ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

BEXAR COUNTY

Womack, J., filed a concurring opinion, joined by Meyers and Johnson, JJ.

We withdraw our previous and substitute this opinion. I join the opinion of the Court. I write only to emphasize that, because of the peculiar procedural posture of this appeal, that opinion does not resolve the problem that faces trial courts: whether to admit breath-test results without extrapolation evidence. This appeal presents only half of the problem, relevancy. As Judge Price's opinion, post, points out, there are serious issues about the other half, weighing the relevancy value against possibly unfair prejudicial effect.

En banc.

Delivered March 3, 2004.

Publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stewart, Dawn Kuretsch, (Tex. 2004).

Stewart, Dawn Kuretsch (Stewart, Dawn Kuretsch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.