Stewart B. Brooks v. Rex A. Zent Richard P. Seiter John H. Newsome Judith Allen, Defendants

810 F.2d 199, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 33730, 1986 WL 18398
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedNovember 17, 1986
Docket85-3962
StatusUnpublished

This text of 810 F.2d 199 (Stewart B. Brooks v. Rex A. Zent Richard P. Seiter John H. Newsome Judith Allen, Defendants) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stewart B. Brooks v. Rex A. Zent Richard P. Seiter John H. Newsome Judith Allen, Defendants, 810 F.2d 199, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 33730, 1986 WL 18398 (6th Cir. 1986).

Opinion

810 F.2d 199

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Stewart B. BROOKS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Rex A. ZENT; Richard P. Seiter; John H. Newsome; Judith
Allen, Defendants- Appellees.

No. 85-3962.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Nov. 17, 1986.

Before WELLFORD and GUY, Circuit Judges, and PECK, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Appellant appeals pro se from the district court's order granting the defendants' motion for summary judgment, thereby denying his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 first and fourteenth amendment claims. The case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the briefs and the record, the panel agrees unanimously that oral argument is not needed. Rule 34(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. The district court dealt with the issues fully and properly analyzed the pertinent authority.

It is ORDERED that the district court's judgment be affirmed for the reasons stated in the district court's opinion. Rule 9(d)(3), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brumbaugh v. Celeste
810 F.2d 199 (Sixth Circuit, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
810 F.2d 199, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 33730, 1986 WL 18398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-b-brooks-v-rex-a-zent-richard-p-seiter-joh-ca6-1986.