Steward v. State

784 S.W.2d 853, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 266, 1990 WL 14923
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 20, 1990·No. No. 56721·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[854]*854ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Steward v. State, 784 S.W.2d 853, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 266, 1990 WL 14923 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990).

784 S.W.2d 853 (Steward v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Steward v. Lewis
E.D. Missouri, 2022