Steward v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedJune 10, 2020
Docket1:20-cv-00325
StatusUnknown

This text of Steward v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston (Steward v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Steward v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston, (E.D. Cal. 2020).

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 Case No. 1:20-cv-00325-AWI-SAB 10 SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P 16) 11 Initial Disclosure Deadline: 12 June 30, 2020 STEVE STEWARD,

13 Administrative Record Filing Deadline: Plaintiff, January 4, 2021 14 v. Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines: 15 Filing: November 4, 2020 LIBERTY LIFE ASSURANCE Hearing: Pursuant to Local Rules COMPANY OF BOSTON, 16 Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Defendant. 17 Opening Brief: January 25, 2021

Responsive Brief: February 15, 2021 18 Hearing: February 22, 2021, at 1:30 p.m. in Courtoom 2 19 Bench Trial: April 20, 2021, at 8:30 a.m. in 20 Courtroom 2 (1 day)

22 I. Date of Scheduling Conference 23 The Scheduling Conference was held on June 9, 2020. 24 II. Appearances of Counsel 25 Brent Brehm appeared telephonically on behalf of Plaintiff Steve Steward. 26 Jenny Wang appeared telephonically on behalf of Defendant Liberty Life Assurance 27 Company of Boston. 28 1 III. Consent to Magistrate Judge 2 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), to the parties who have not consented to conduct all 3 further proceedings in this case, including trial,1 before United States Magistrate Judge Stanley A. 4 Boone, you should be informed that because of the pressing workload of United States district 5 judges and the priority of criminal cases under the United States Constitution, you are encouraged 6 to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction in an effort to have your case adjudicated in a timely 7 and cost effective manner. Presently, when a civil trial is set before Judge Ishii, any criminal trial 8 set which conflicts with the civil trial will take priority, even if the civil trial was set first. 9 Continuances of civil trials under these circumstances may no longer be entertained, absent a 10 specific and stated finding of good cause, but the civil trial may instead trail from day to day or 11 week to week until the completion of either the criminal case or the older civil case. The parties 12 are advised that they are free to withhold consent or decline magistrate jurisdiction without 13 adverse substantive consequences. 14 IV. Initial Disclosure under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) 15 The Parties are ordered to exchange the initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 26(a)(1) on or before June 30, 2020. 17 V. Amendments to Pleading 18 Any motions or stipulations requesting leave to amend the pleadings must be filed no later 19 than June 16, 2020. The parties are advised that filing motions and/or stipulations requesting 20 leave to amend the pleadings does not reflect on the propriety of the amendment or imply good 21 cause to modify the existing schedule, if necessary. All proposed amendments must (A) be 22 supported by good cause pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) if the amendment requires any 23 modification to the existing schedule, see Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 24 609 (9th Cir. 1992), and (B) establish, under Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a), that such an amendment is not 25 (1) prejudicial to the opposing party, (2) the product of undue delay, (3) proposed in bad faith, or 26 (4) futile, see Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962). 27 1 Except those proceedings delegated to the United States magistrate judges by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and the district 28 judges by the Local Rules for the Eastern District of California. 1 VI. Pre-Trial Motion Schedule 2 Unless prior leave of Court is obtained at least seven (7) days before the filing date, all 3 moving and opposition briefs or legal memorandum in civil cases shall not exceed twenty-five 4 (25) pages. Reply briefs filed by moving parties shall not exceed ten (10) pages. Before 5 scheduling any motion, the parties must comply with all requirements set forth in Local Rule 230 6 and 251. 7 A. Non-Dispositive Pre-Trial Motions 8 All non-dispositive pre-trial motions shall be filed no later than November 4, 2020, and 9 heard pursuant to the Local Rules in Courtroom 9. Non-dispositive motions are heard on 10 Wednesdays at 10:00 a.m., before United States Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone in Courtroom 11 9. 12 In scheduling any non-dispositive motion, the Magistrate Judge may grant Applications 13 for an Order Shortening Time pursuant to Local Rule 144(e). However, if counsel does not 14 obtain an Order Shortening Time, the Notice of Motion must comply with Local Rule 251. 15 Counsel may appear and argue non-dispositive motions by telephone, providing a written 16 request to so appear is made to the Magistrate Judge’s Courtroom Clerk no later than three (3) 17 court days before the noticed hearing date. In the event that more than one attorney requests to 18 appear by telephone, then it shall be the obligation of the moving party(ies) to arrange and 19 originate a conference call to the court. 20 B. Dispositive Pre-Trial Motions 21 The Administrative Record shall be filed no later than January 4, 2021. Motions for 22 Summary Judgment shall be filed no later than January 25, 2021. Responsive briefs shall be 23 filed no later than February 15, 2021. The motion for summary judgment shall be heard on 24 February 22, 2021, at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 2 before Senior Judge Anthony W. Ishii.2 25

26 2 The parties requested that a bench trial be set on March 22, 2021, and at the scheduling conference the Court set the bench trial for March 23, 2021. However, upon conferring with Judge 27 Ishii’s chambers, the bench trial needs to be set two months after the hearing on the motions for summary judgment. Accordingly, the Court sets a hearing on the motions for summary judgment 28 pursuant to the Local Rules and the bench trial is set two months after the hearing. 1 Prior to filing a motion for summary judgment or motion for summary adjudication, the 2 parties are ORDERED to meet, in person or by telephone, and confer to discuss the issues to be 3 raised in the motion. 4 The purpose of the meeting shall be to: 1) avoid filing motions for summary judgment 5 where a question of fact exists; 2) determine whether the respondent agrees that the motion has 6 merit in whole or in part; 3) discuss whether issues can be resolved without the necessity of 7 briefing; 4) narrow the issues for review by the court; and 5) explore the possibility of settlement 8 before the parties incur the expense of briefing a summary judgment motion. 9 The moving party shall initiate the meeting. In addition to the requirements of Local 10 Rule 260, the moving party shall file a Joint Statement of Undisputed Facts. 11 In the Notice of Motion, the moving party shall certify that the parties have met and 12 conferred as ordered above or set forth a statement of good cause for the failure to meet and 13 confer. 14 VII. Trial Date 15 Trial is set for April 20, 2021, at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 2 before Senior United States 16 District Judge Anthony W. Ishii. 17 A. This is a bench trial. 18 B. Counsels’ Estimate of Trial Time: 1 Day. 19 C. Counsels’ attention is directed to Local Rule 285 for the Eastern District of 20 California. 21 VIII. Related Matters Pending 22 There are no pending related matters. 23 IX.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Foman v. Davis
371 U.S. 178 (Supreme Court, 1962)
Perrin v. Sikes
1 Day 19 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1802)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Steward v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steward-v-liberty-life-assurance-company-of-boston-caed-2020.