Steward v. Krauskopf

91 A.D.2d 978, 457 N.Y.S.2d 569, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16276

This text of 91 A.D.2d 978 (Steward v. Krauskopf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Steward v. Krauskopf, 91 A.D.2d 978, 457 N.Y.S.2d 569, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16276 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinions

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent State Commissioner of Social Services, dated September 3, 1981 and made after a statutory fair hearing, which affirmed a determination of the local agency discontinuing petitioner’s grant of public assistance in the category of aid to dependent children. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. The determination to discontinue petitioner’s grant of public assistance on the ground that the petitioner’s husband, the father of her children, was residing in the household, is supported by substantial evidence appearing on the record as a whole, including, inter alia, the petitioner’s admissions at the fair hearing. The determination must therefore be confirmed and the proceeding dismissed, as the petitioner fails to satisfy the statutory criteria of categorical eligibility for aid to dependent children set forth in section 349 (subd B, par 1) of the Social Services Law (see US Code, tit 42, § 606, subd [a]; Matter of Wright v D’Elia, 83 AD2d 951; Matter of Hairston v Toia, 79 AD2d 1011). Our confirmance of the State commissioner’s determination cannot, however, affect the petitioner’s right to apply for benefits under section 158 or 349 (subd B, par 1-a) of the Social Services Law (see, also, US Code, tit 42, § 607, subd [a]), or to reapply for benefits under section 349 (subd B, par 1) of the Social Services Law should the circumstances warrant it. Mangano, J. P., Thompson and Gulotta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MATTER OF LEE v. Smith
373 N.E.2d 247 (New York Court of Appeals, 1977)
Hagood v. Berger
366 N.E.2d 1345 (New York Court of Appeals, 1977)
Tucker v. Toia
371 N.E.2d 449 (New York Court of Appeals, 1977)
300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human Rights
379 N.E.2d 1183 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)
Wasservogel v. Blum
429 N.E.2d 131 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
Darrow v. D'Elia
54 A.D.2d 905 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Woodley v. Lavine
54 A.D.2d 912 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Mastan v. Fahey
60 A.D.2d 304 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Hairston v. Toia
79 A.D.2d 1011 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Henny v. Weinberg
80 A.D.2d 831 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Rosenfeld v. Blum
82 A.D.2d 559 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Wright v. D'Elia
83 A.D.2d 951 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Allen v. Blum
85 A.D.2d 228 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 A.D.2d 978, 457 N.Y.S.2d 569, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steward-v-krauskopf-nyappdiv-1983.