Steward v. Kitchell

Appellate Court of Illinois

Steward v. Kitchell

193 Ill. App. 526

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided April 16, 1915·Published

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Eldredge

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. Equity, § 336*—when complainant cannot dismiss. Under the Chancery Act, sec. 36 (J. & A. § 916), providing that a complainant may not dismiss his hill after a cross-hill has been filed without the consent of the defendant, it is not error to overrule a motion by complainant to dismiss the original bill where the cross-bill is germane to it.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Eldredge

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. Equity, § 336*—when complainant cannot dismiss. Under the Chancery Act, sec. 36 (J. & A. § 916), providing that a complainant may not dismiss his hill after a cross-hill has been filed without the consent of the defendant, it is not error to overrule a motion by complainant to dismiss the original bill where the cross-bill is germane to it.

Steward v. Kitchell, 193 Ill. App. 526 (Ill. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

193 Ill. App. 526 (Steward v. Kitchell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.