Steward v. Kitchell

Appellate Court of Illinois

Steward v. Kitchell

193 Ill. App. 526

DecidedApril 16, 1915

StatusPublished

This text of 193 Ill. App. 526 (Steward v. Kitchell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Steward v. Kitchell, 193 Ill. App. 526 (Ill. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Eldredge

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. Equity, § 336*—when complainant cannot dismiss. Under the Chancery Act, sec. 36 (J. & A. § 916), providing that a complainant may not dismiss his hill after a cross-hill has been filed without the consent of the defendant, it is not error to overrule a motion by complainant to dismiss the original bill where the cross-bill is germane to it.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Eldredge

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. Equity, § 336*—when complainant cannot dismiss. Under the Chancery Act, sec. 36 (J. & A. § 916), providing that a complainant may not dismiss his hill after a cross-hill has been filed without the consent of the defendant, it is not error to overrule a motion by complainant to dismiss the original bill where the cross-bill is germane to it.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

193 Ill. App. 526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steward-v-kitchell-illappct-1915.