Steward v. Hotchkiss

2 Cow. 634
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1824·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Curia.

This plea is false in fact beyond all doubt, and there is some difficulty in saying whether it should be answered, or is demurrable. Notwithstanding the legal question which arises upon its face, we should suffer it to stand upon a very slight suggestion of its truth : none such is made. Its falsehood is conceded, and we will not suffer the plaintiff to be placed in danger of a trap, by requiring him to elect whether he will answer or demur to a plea which is not plainly valid in law upon it face, and at the same time is admitted to be untrue in fact. Take your rule.

Rule to strike out the second plea.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Steward v. Hotchkiss, 2 Cow. 634 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1824).

2 Cow. 634 (Steward v. Hotchkiss) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wayland v. . Tysen
45 N.Y. 281 (New York Court of Appeals, 1871)
Beeson v. McConnaha
12 Ind. 420 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1859)
McNulty v. Batty
2 Pin. 53 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1847)