Steward v. City of Trenton

156 A. 844, 9 N.J. Misc. 1100, 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 129
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 4, 1931·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Pee Citkiam:.

This case is similar to No. 205 of this term, Mulleady et al. v. City of Trenton et al., and what was said in that case applies to this case.

Our conclusion is that a writ of certiorari should be awarded to prosecutors. The rule to show cause is made absolute and a writ of certiorari to review the action of the zoning board of adjustment of the city of Trenton in denying the application of prosecutors for a building permit to enclose with glass and frame enclosure a porch on property owned by them at 947 Carteret avenue, in said city of Trenton, is awarded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Steward v. City of Trenton, 156 A. 844, 9 N.J. Misc. 1100, 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 129 (N.J. 1931).

156 A. 844 (Steward v. City of Trenton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Eastern Boulevard Corp. v. Board of Commissioners of West New York
11 A.2d 832 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1940)
Dorsey Motors, Inc. v. Davis
180 A. 396 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1935)