Steward v. City of Trenton

156 A. 844, 9 N.J. Misc. 1100, 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 129
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedNovember 4, 1931
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 156 A. 844 (Steward v. City of Trenton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Steward v. City of Trenton, 156 A. 844, 9 N.J. Misc. 1100, 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 129 (N.J. 1931).

Opinion

Pee Citkiam:.

This case is similar to No. 205 of this term, Mulleady et al. v. City of Trenton et al., and what was said in that case applies to this case.

Our conclusion is that a writ of certiorari should be awarded to prosecutors. The rule to show cause is made absolute and a writ of certiorari to review the action of the zoning board of adjustment of the city of Trenton in denying the application of prosecutors for a building permit to enclose with glass and frame enclosure a porch on property owned by them at 947 Carteret avenue, in said city of Trenton, is awarded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eastern Boulevard Corp. v. Board of Commissioners of West New York
11 A.2d 832 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1940)
Dorsey Motors, Inc. v. Davis
180 A. 396 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
156 A. 844, 9 N.J. Misc. 1100, 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steward-v-city-of-trenton-nj-1931.