Stevie Locklear v. Randy Lee

Fourth Circuit

Stevie Locklear v. Randy Lee

52 F.3d 321, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17576, 1995 WL 227319

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 18, 1995

Docket94-6687

StatusPublished

This text of 52 F.3d 321 (Stevie Locklear v. Randy Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stevie Locklear v. Randy Lee, 52 F.3d 321, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17576, 1995 WL 227319 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

52 F.3d 321
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Stevie LOCKLEAR, Petitioner--Appellant,
v.
Randy LEE, Respondent--Appellee.

No. 94-6687.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 28, 1995
Decided: April 18, 1995

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-94-65)

Stevie Locklear, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, NC, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Locklear v. Lee, No. CA-94-65 (E.D.N.C. June 1, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

52 F.3d 321
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Stevie LOCKLEAR, Petitioner--Appellant,
v.
Randy LEE, Respondent--Appellee.

No. 94-6687.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 28, 1995
Decided: April 18, 1995

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-94-65)

Stevie Locklear, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, NC, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Locklear v. Lee, No. CA-94-65 (E.D.N.C. June 1, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 F.3d 321, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17576, 1995 WL 227319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stevie-locklear-v-randy-lee-ca4-1995.