Steverson v. Clark

Fourth Circuit

Steverson v. Clark

86 F.2d 330, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 3737

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedNovember 17, 1936

Docket4112

StatusPublished

Cited by11 cases

This text of 86 F.2d 330 (Steverson v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Steverson v. Clark, 86 F.2d 330, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 3737 (4th Cir. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order refusing to adjudicate appellant a bankrupt under subsection (s) of section 75 of the Bankruptcy Act, as amended by the second Frazier-Lemke Act (Act Aug. 28, 1935, § 6 [11 U.S.C.A. § 203 (s). The judge below approved findings by the Conciliation Commissioner to the effect that an offer of composition and extension had not been made in good faith by the bankrupt; and he accordingly refused an adjudication of bankruptcy and dismissed the proceedings on that ground. For that reason, he found it unnecessary to pass upon the constitutional validity of the second Frazier-Lemke Act, although this was duly challenged in appellees’ motion to dismiss. We find nothing in the record which would justify us in disturbing the order of the District Judge approving the findings of the Conciliation Commissioner, and we agree that these afford sufficient ground for denying the adjudication and dismissing the proceedings. In re Borgelt (C.C.A.7th) 79 F.(2d) 929. In addition to this, we have recently held that the second Frazier-Lemke Act is void because violative of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. Robert Page Wright, Bankrupt, v. Vinton Branch of Mountain Trust Bank and five other cases (C.C.A. 4th) 85 F.(2d) 973. In any aspect of the case, therefore, the judge below properly denied the adjudication and dismissed-, the petition. The order appealed from will accordingly be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order refusing to adjudicate appellant a bankrupt under subsection (s) of section 75 of the Bankruptcy Act, as amended by the second Frazier-Lemke Act (Act Aug. 28, 1935, § 6 [11 U.S.C.A. § 203 (s). The judge below approved findings by the Conciliation Commissioner to the effect that an offer of composition and extension had not been made in good faith by the bankrupt; and he accordingly refused an adjudication of bankruptcy and dismissed the proceedings on that ground. For that reason, he found it unnecessary to pass upon the constitutional validity of the second Frazier-Lemke Act, although this was duly challenged in appellees’ motion to dismiss. We find nothing in the record which would justify us in disturbing the order of the District Judge approving the findings of the Conciliation Commissioner, and we agree that these afford sufficient ground for denying the adjudication and dismissing the proceedings. In re Borgelt (C.C.A.7th) 79 F.(2d) 929. In addition to this, we have recently held that the second Frazier-Lemke Act is void because violative of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. Robert Page Wright, Bankrupt, v. Vinton Branch of Mountain Trust Bank and five other cases (C.C.A. 4th) 85 F.(2d) 973. In any aspect of the case, therefore, the judge below properly denied the adjudication and dismissed-, the petition. The order appealed from will accordingly be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

86 F.2d 330, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 3737, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steverson-v-clark-ca4-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack