Stevensons Moygashel Linens, Ltd. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Stevensons Moygashel Linens, Ltd. v. United States

20 Cust. Ct. 408, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 401

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedMarch 19, 1948

DocketNo. 7566; Entry Nos. 758106; 715822

StatusPublished

This text of 20 Cust. Ct. 408 (Stevensons Moygashel Linens, Ltd. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stevensons Moygashel Linens, Ltd. v. United States, 20 Cust. Ct. 408, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 401 (cusc 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

Tilson, Judge:

In submitting the two appeals listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, counsel for the respective parties have agreed that the issue herein is the same as the issue involved in United States v. Pitcairn, C. A. D. 334, and the record in said case has been admitted in evidence herein. As to appeal No. 165118-A counsel have also agreed that the appraised values, less any additions made by the importer on entry to meet advances by the appraiser in similar cases represent the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities in the ordinary course of trade.

As to appeal No. 145160-A counsel have also agreed that the entered values are equal to the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country of exportation in the usual wholesale quantities in the ordinary course of trade, and that the foreign values were not higher.

Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact and following the cited authority, I find and hold the proper dutiable export value of the merchandise covered by appeal No. 165118-A to be the appraised value, less any additions made on entry to meet advances made by the appraiser in similar cases.

I also find and hold the proper dutiable export value of the merchandise covered by appeal No. 145160-A to be the entered value. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tilson, Judge:

In submitting the two appeals listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, counsel for the respective parties have agreed that the issue herein is the same as the issue involved in United States v. Pitcairn, C. A. D. 334, and the record in said case has been admitted in evidence herein. As to appeal No. 165118-A counsel have also agreed that the appraised values, less any additions made by the importer on entry to meet advances by the appraiser in similar cases represent the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities in the ordinary course of trade.

As to appeal No. 145160-A counsel have also agreed that the entered values are equal to the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country of exportation in the usual wholesale quantities in the ordinary course of trade, and that the foreign values were not higher.

Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact and following the cited authority, I find and hold the proper dutiable export value of the merchandise covered by appeal No. 165118-A to be the appraised value, less any additions made on entry to meet advances made by the appraiser in similar cases.

I also find and hold the proper dutiable export value of the merchandise covered by appeal No. 145160-A to be the entered value. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 Cust. Ct. 408, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stevensons-moygashel-linens-ltd-v-united-states-cusc-1948.