Stevenson v. Whisnant

Supreme Court of Georgia

Stevenson v. Whisnant

381 S.E.2d 515, 259 Ga. 273

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 8, 1989·No. S8900023·Published

Opinion

Per curiam.

In view of the fact that this is a direct application to this Court for a writ of mandamus, this case is controlled by Brown v. Johnson, [274]*274251 Ga. 436 (306 SE2d 655) (1983), and the petition is therefore dismissed.

Decided June 8, 1989. Jimmy Lee Stevenson, pro se. Douglas C. Pullen, District Attorney, for appellee.

Petition for writ dismissed.

All the Justices concur, except Weltner, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam.

In view of the fact that this is a direct application to this Court for a writ of mandamus, this case is controlled by Brown v. Johnson, [274]*274251 Ga. 436 (306 SE2d 655) (1983), and the petition is therefore dismissed.

Decided June 8, 1989. Jimmy Lee Stevenson, pro se. Douglas C. Pullen, District Attorney, for appellee.

Petition for writ dismissed.

All the Justices concur, except Weltner, J., not participating.

Stevenson v. Whisnant, 381 S.E.2d 515, 259 Ga. 273 (Ga. 1989).

Pincite

381 S.E.2d 515 (Stevenson v. Whisnant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related