Stevenson v. the First Jud. Dist. Ct.

Nevada Supreme Court

Stevenson v. the First Jud. Dist. Ct.

DecidedJanuary 14, 2016

Docket69294

StatusUnpublished

This text of Stevenson v. the First Jud. Dist. Ct. (Stevenson v. the First Jud. Dist. Ct.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stevenson v. the First Jud. Dist. Ct., (Neb. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

RONALD ALEX STEVENSON, No. 69294 Petitioner, vs. THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF FILE CARSON CITY; AND THE HONORABLE JAMES E. WILSON, JAN 1 4 2016 DISTRICT JUDGE, TRACE K. UNDEMAN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT Respondents. BY DEPUTY CLERK

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS This is an original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus challenging a district court order denying petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Having considered the petition and supporting documents, we are not persuaded that the district court arbitrarily and capriciously exercised its discretion in denying petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis so as to warrant writ relief. NRS 34.160; Int'l Game Tech., Inc. v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 124 Nev. 193, 197, 179 P.3d 556, 558 (2008); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (recognizing that petitioner bears the burden to

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 147- 0 1 2 SI demonstrate that writ relief is warranted); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.'

fret Atlen , J. Hardesty

Saitta

cc: Hon. James E. Wilson, District Judge Ronald Alex Stevenson Attorney General/Carson City Carson City Clerk

'Petitioner's December 3, 2015, motion for leave to file pro se documents is denied as moot.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A atep

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

RONALD ALEX STEVENSON, No. 69294 Petitioner, vs. THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF FILE CARSON CITY; AND THE HONORABLE JAMES E. WILSON, JAN 1 4 2016 DISTRICT JUDGE, TRACE K. UNDEMAN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT Respondents. BY DEPUTY CLERK

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS This is an original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus challenging a district court order denying petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Having considered the petition and supporting documents, we are not persuaded that the district court arbitrarily and capriciously exercised its discretion in denying petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis so as to warrant writ relief. NRS 34.160; Int'l Game Tech., Inc. v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 124 Nev. 193, 197, 179 P.3d 556, 558 (2008); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (recognizing that petitioner bears the burden to

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 147- 0 1 2 SI demonstrate that writ relief is warranted); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.'

fret Atlen , J. Hardesty

Saitta

cc: Hon. James E. Wilson, District Judge Ronald Alex Stevenson Attorney General/Carson City Carson City Clerk

'Petitioner's December 3, 2015, motion for leave to file pro se documents is denied as moot.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A atep

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Stevenson v. the First Jud. Dist. Ct., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stevenson-v-the-first-jud-dist-ct-nev-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack