Stevenson v. Stevenson

3 Edw. Ch. 340, 1839 N.Y. LEXIS 332, 1839 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 4
New York Court of Chancery·Decided September 24, 1839·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The Vice-Chancellor :

A parly to a suit cannot change his solicitor without an order of the court: Mumford v. Murray, Hopk. 369 ; but it is no objection to the making of such an order that the first solicitor's costs are not paid. If he has a lien upon papers or any thing in his hands for his costs, the court will not deprive him of the lien, nor will the court, on the other hand, make it a condition of the order that the costs • of the solicitor be first paid : Twort v. Dayrell, 13 Ves. 195.

Where there is nothing upon which he has a lien, he must be left to the personal responsibility of the client and to his remedy by action.

The order, in this case, must be made for the substitution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stevenson v. Stevenson, 3 Edw. Ch. 340, 1839 N.Y. LEXIS 332, 1839 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 4 (N.Y. 1839).

3 Edw. Ch. 340 (Stevenson v. Stevenson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilkinson v. Tilden
14 F. 778 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1883)