Stevenson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Stevenson v. State

1916 OK CR 122, 165 P. 156, 12 Okla. Crim. 622, 1916 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 130

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 23, 1916

DocketNo. A-2652.

StatusPublished

This text of 1916 OK CR 122 (Stevenson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stevenson v. State, 1916 OK CR 122, 165 P. 156, 12 Okla. Crim. 622, 1916 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 130 (Okla. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On information charging that he did have in his possession intoxicating liquors with intent to sell the same, the plaintiff in error, J. S. Stevenson was tried and eonvieted in the county court of Garvin county and his punishment assessed at confinement in the county jail for thirty days and a fine of one hundred dollars. Prom the judgment rendered on the verdict he appealed by filing in this court on February 19, 1916, a petition in error with case-made. No brief has been filed. When the ease was called on the assignment for final submission no appearance was made on behalf of the plaintiff in error, whereupon the attorney general moved that the judgment be affirmed for failure to prosecute the appeal. A careful examination of the record discloses that the assignments of error are without merit. The judgment herein is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On information charging that he did have in his possession intoxicating liquors with intent to sell the same, the plaintiff in error, J. S. Stevenson was tried and eonvieted in the county court of Garvin county and his punishment assessed at confinement in the county jail for thirty days and a fine of one hundred dollars. Prom the judgment rendered on the verdict he appealed by filing in this court on February 19, 1916, a petition in error with case-made. No brief has been filed. When the ease was called on the assignment for final submission no appearance was made on behalf of the plaintiff in error, whereupon the attorney general moved that the judgment be affirmed for failure to prosecute the appeal. A careful examination of the record discloses that the assignments of error are without merit. The judgment herein is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1916 OK CR 122, 165 P. 156, 12 Okla. Crim. 622, 1916 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stevenson-v-state-oklacrimapp-1916.