Stevenson v. Pritchard
175 S.E.2d 367, 9 N.C. App. 59, 1970 N.C. App. LEXIS 1281
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided July 15, 1970·No. No. 709DC294·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The findings of fact by the court have the force and effect of a verdict of a jury and are conclusive if supported by any competent evidence. The record before us fails to disclose any competent evidence to support the court’s finding:
“That the said windshield wiper refill blade sold by the defendant to the plaintiff and as installed by the defendant did not work in an acceptable manner on the plaintiff’s 1964 Thunderbird as it caused the windshield wipers to scratch the driver’s side of the windshield in approximately top half circle scratches.”
The findings which are supported by the evidence are insufficient to support the judgment. We do not reach, therefore, the other questions raised in the briefs of the parties.
Eeversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stevenson v. Pritchard, 175 S.E.2d 367, 9 N.C. App. 59, 1970 N.C. App. LEXIS 1281 (N.C. Ct. App. 1970).
175 S.E.2d 367 (Stevenson v. Pritchard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dunham's Music House, Inc. v. Asheville Theatres, Inc.
178 S.E.2d 124 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1970)