Stevenson v. Pemberton

1 U.S. 3, 1 Dall. 3
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 15, 1760
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 U.S. 3 (Stevenson v. Pemberton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stevenson v. Pemberton, 1 U.S. 3, 1 Dall. 3 (1760).

Opinion

By the Court.

This Rum appears to have been sent to satisfy P’s Debt. If it had been Money, there could have been no doubt but the Defendant would have retained it. And the only difference is that a Commodity was sent which must be converted into Money, before the Sum to be paid to P. could be ascertained, but, as to P’s interest in it, the Case was the same. Therefore judgment, by the whole Court, was given for the Defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stevenson v. Pemberton
1 U.S. 3 (Supreme Court, 1760)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 U.S. 3, 1 Dall. 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stevenson-v-pemberton-pa-1760.