Stevenson v. Pemberton
This text of 1 U.S. 3 (Stevenson v. Pemberton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This Rum appears to have been sent to satisfy P’s Debt. If it had been Money, there could have been no doubt but the Defendant would have retained it. And the only difference is that a Commodity was sent which must be converted into Money, before the Sum to be paid to P. could be ascertained, but, as to P’s interest in it, the Case was the same. Therefore judgment, by the whole Court, was given for the Defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 U.S. 3, 1 Dall. 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stevenson-v-pemberton-pa-1760.