Stevenson v. Kent
This text of 44 Mich. 162 (Stevenson v. Kent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The receipt given by the justice in this case shows that he had received “ ten dollars as fees and costs on appeal of case,” etc. The claim afterwards set up by him that the costs were taxed at ten dollars, and that, while the costs were paid him, the one dollar for making his return had not been, would be in direct conflict with his receipt. He may have a claim against the appellant for the amount unpaid, but it was his duty to make due return to the appeal. The party had a right to rely upon the receipt given, and he should not be deprived of his right to an appeal because of a misunderstanding with the justice.
The writ must issue.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
44 Mich. 162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stevenson-v-kent-mich-1880.