Stevenson v. French

Fourth Circuit

Stevenson v. French

14 F. App'x 174

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 3, 2001·No. 01-6431·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James Frederick Stevenson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Stevenson’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Stevenson v. French, No. CA-95-119-2-MU (W.D.N.C. filed Mar. 7, 2001; entered Mar. 8, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented *175 in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

James Frederick Stevenson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Stevenson’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Stevenson v. French, No. CA-95-119-2-MU (W.D.N.C. filed Mar. 7, 2001; entered Mar. 8, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented *175 in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Stevenson v. French, 14 F. App'x 174 (4th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

14 F. App'x 174 (Stevenson v. French) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related